THE NEW HISTORY EYES
Presented by hirotsugu nishina
Vol.0050…『21世紀倭国ニッポンの国体見直し論』
倭国と言う国名は中国が日本を侮蔑的な意味で捉えたものではあるが、今の日本の為政者達を見るとあながち排除できないことがうかがえる。そう言われても仕方がない状況にある。劉備玄徳の軍師だった諸葛亮孔明は、大切な部下の馬謖を不条理な件で大義のため斬りつけた。今の日本を見ていると個人的に「泣いて馬謖を斬る」という思いが募ってくる。三国志で有名な曹操の死後、その子息である曹丕（そうひ）が後漢の最後の皇帝劉協（皇后は曹操の娘曹節）から玉璽を禅譲され初代魏王朝の皇帝に就任した。倭国（ニッポン）は魏王朝（220年～265年）から「親魏倭王」の金印を賜っている。朝貢外交はすでに卑弥呼の時代から始まっていたようだが、当時日本には国家の史書なるものは存在しておらず、歴史認識においては「魏史倭人伝」での邪馬台国の客観的な内政報告に頼らざるを得なかった。日本の国体の歴史は大和朝廷から始まるが、天皇家主体の国体精神は今日まで続いている。戦前の君主天皇制から象徴天皇制に移行して、国会の大臣任命式では天皇が関わっていることからみても日本の戦後の国体では、昭和天皇とマッカーサーとの十数回にわたる会談からみて皇室の安泰が最優先されたと言えなくもない。朝鮮戦争の影響で日本は神武景気に浮かれ、もはや戦後ではないという妄想を抱いてしまった。日本の戦後経済復興はなんらかの犠牲の上で成り立っていた。今更批判しても無意味だが、岸信介氏はA級戦犯で死刑の予定であったが、直前で刑を免れた理由は今もって闇の中だ。今で言う日米での司法取引という手法だったかもしれない。彼は総理大臣という座を射止め岸一族の名をほしいままにした経緯がある。佐藤栄作氏・安倍晋三氏はまさしく岸一族の一員だった。今の習近平皇帝が治める中国は21世紀になっても、発展途上国という優遇策に甘んじ、英国からの香港返還後、50年間の一国二制度の約束をしながら27年前倒しでそれを反故にした責任は非常に重いといえる。中華人民共和国は1971年に中華民国と入れ替わり、国際連合の常任理事国となったが、この背景には米国側が中国側と妥協性を帯びた戦略的互恵関係を築こうとした疑念が湧いてくる。米国には中華人民共和国の経済を安定させてあげれば自由主義国のような民主化促進に拍車がかかるだろうという甘い見通しがあったが、案の定それは失敗に終わった。毛政権では文化破壊大革命で数千万人の民を殺め、貴重な伝統的文化をも闇に葬った。習政権では再度それを行おうとしている。まさに時代に逆行する。そういう一党独裁国家を経済的視野で自由主義の枠内に引っ張ってきたツケがいま世界は背負わされているわけだ。中国大陸では歴史が再び繰り返されることを多くの民は待ち望んでいる。1970年代でのニクソン政権と毛沢東政権での水面下での太平洋二分割構想は今でも生きているとみている。周恩来とキッシンジャーの会談では日本の隷属化と弱体化案が練られていたようだが、現在の米中対立の裏では堅い結束があるはずだ。歴代の米国大統領と中国政権が刺しちがえるというのは現実的ではない。大量の米国債を所有している中国が米国との戦争をするわけがないのだ。国際連合にとって敗戦国ニッポンは未だに敵国条項扱いとなっていることから、プレトンウッズ体制が終わっても未だに形を変えて世界秩序が形成されていることがうかがえる。日本の国体を良くしていこうと考えるならば、倭国ニッポン人はそういう冷徹な視点で見る覚悟が必要だ。先の衆議院総選挙を見ても日本の為政者達には良識の自覚が欠如し、有権者の民主主義嫌悪（選挙投票への無関心が良い例だ）が相互に作用し、戦後の日本では議会制民主主義が体を成していない事が分かった今、新たな日本の国体の見直しが必要とされていることを認識すべきである。そうでもしなければ日本の「日出る国」の復活はあり得ない。
THE NEW HISTORY EYES
Presented by hirotsugu nishina
Vol.0050… "21st Century Wakoku Japan National Athletic Meet Review Theory"
The name Wakoku is what China has taken in a derogatory sense of Japan, but looking at the current Japanese politicians, it can be seen that it cannot be excluded. There is no help for it even if it is said so. Zhuge Liang Komei, a warrior of Liu Bei Gentoku, slashed his important subordinate Ma Su for an absurd matter. Looking at Japan today, I personally feel that I'm crying and slashing the horse. After the death of Cao Cao, who is famous for the Three Kingdoms, his son, Cao Pi, was transferred to Shan Rang by the last emperor Liu Kyo (the empress is Cao Cao's daughter) and became the first emperor of the Wei dynasty. Wakoku (Nippon) has been awarded the gold seal of "Professional Wei King" from the Wei Dynasty (220-265). It seems that tribute diplomacy had already begun in the era of Himiko, but at that time there was no national history book in Japan, and in terms of historical recognition, the objective of Yamatai was found in the "Wei Shiijinden". I had to rely on the domestic affairs report. The history of Japan's national polity begins with the Yamato court, but the spirit of the national polity centered on the Emperor continues to this day. From the transition from the prewar monarchy emperor system to the symbolic emperor system, and the fact that the emperor was involved in the ministerial appointment ceremony of the Diet, in the postwar national polity of Japan, the imperial family was seen from the dozens of talks between Emperor Showa and MacArthur. It can be said that the security of Japan was given top priority. Due to the influence of the Korean War, Japan was floated in the Shinbu economy and had a delusion that it was no longer after the war. Japan's postwar economic recovery came at some cost. It is meaningless to criticize it now, but Mr. Nobusuke Kishi was scheduled to be sentenced to death for a class A war criminal, but the reason why he escaped the sentence just before is still in the dark. It may have been the method of judicial transactions in Japan and the United States. He has a history of taking the position of prime minister and wanting the name of the Kishi clan. Eisaku Sato and Shinzo Abe were truly members of the Kishi clan. Even in the 21st century, China, which is now governed by Emperor Xi Jinping, is content with the preferential treatment of developing countries, and after returning to Hong Kong from the United Kingdom, he promised a one country, two systems system for 50 years and rebelled against it 27 years ahead of schedule. It can be said that the responsibility made is very heavy. The People's Republic of China replaced the Republic of China in 1971 and became a permanent member of the United Nations, but in the background there was suspicion that the United States tried to establish a compromised strategic reciprocal relationship with the Chinese side. come. The United States had a sweet prospect that stabilizing the economy of the People's Republic of China would spur democratization like a liberal country, but it failed, as expected. The Mao administration killed tens of millions of people in the Cultural Destruction Revolution and buried precious traditional culture in the dark. The Xi administration is trying to do that again. It just goes against the times. The world is now carrying the luck of pulling such a one-party dictatorship within the framework of liberalism from an economic perspective. Many people are waiting for history to repeat itself in mainland China. The underwater Pacific dichotomy under the 1970s by the Nixon and Mao Zedong administrations is still alive. At the meeting between Zhou Enlai and Kissinger, Japan's enslavement and weakening plans seemed to have been devised, but there must be a tight bond behind the current US-China conflict. It is not realistic for successive US presidents and the Chinese administration to stab each other. China, which owns a large amount of US Treasuries, cannot go to war with the United States. Since Japan, the defeated country, is still treated as an enemy state clause for the United Nations, it can be seen that even after the Preton Woods system is over, the world order is still being formed. If you want to improve Japan's national polity, the Japanese people in Wakoku need to be prepared to look at it from such a cold perspective. Looking at the previous House of Representatives general election, Japanese politicians lacked awareness of goodwill, and voters' dislike of democracy (a good example of indifference to election voting) interacted, and in postwar Japan the parliamentary system It should be recognized that a new review of Japan's national polity is needed now that democracy has been found to be non-formal. Otherwise, Japan's "land of the rising sun" cannot be revived.
